A rule of thumb from the 1800s to predict the height of children based on their parents stature is still far more accurate than the best genomic predictions. In 1886 Sir Francis Galton a Victorian scientist who also pioneered the field of eugenics published a technique to predict the height of children. It averages the height of both parents and makes adjustments for age and sex.
“It s really not rocket science ” says Yurii Aulchenko a geneticist at Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Aulchenko s team compared this approach to a more complicated calculation based on gene variations linked to height. Researchers previously identified these mutations by scanning the genomes of tens of thousands of people and then hunting for single letter changes shared by people of similar stature. Minor correlation Aulchenko s team analysed 54 of these genetic variants across 5748 Dutch people and calculated a simple score for each person. The higher a person s score the more gene variants linked to tall stature he or she possessed. But when these numbers were plotted against each person s height and adjusted for age and sex Aulchenko s team found only a minor correlation between a person s genetic score and their actual height. Galton s method on the other hand proved about 10 times better at guessing the height of another 550 people.
Joel Hirschhorn a geneticist at the Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University in Cambridge Massachusetts isn t surprised by the poor prognostic ability of genes linked to height – including a handful identified by his lab. The team noted just as much when it published its findings in 2008. This is because most genetic variations have a miniscule affect on height and many more have yet to be identified Aulchenko says. A few traits such as eye colour are easier to predict with genes and new research will certainly improve genetic prognostication. But for now most of our features remain a genetic black box.
Try these sites if you want to predict your child’s height:
While there is no magic way to look into the future to see how tall your children will be when they grow up, these height predictors can give you a pretty good idea of what your child’s future height will be:
- Kid’s Height Predictor – predict your children’s future height based on their genetic potential (which is based on their parents’ midparental height)
- Kid’s Height Calculator – Two Years Times Two Method, which uses simple linear regressions and doubles a child’s height at age two years
- Yet Another Height Calculator – use your child’s current height and where they are on the growth curve right now to predict their future height
Follow(Twitter)
Subscribe
Thanks
A rule of thumb from the 1800s to predict the height of children based on their parents stature is still far more accurate than the best genomic predictions. In 1886 Sir Francis Galton a Victorian scientist who also pioneered the field of eugenics published a technique to predict the height of children. It averages the height of both parents and makes adjustments for age and sex.

The saying goes that it takes only one white crow to prove all crows aren’t black. We saw absolutely certain kinds of things occur under pretty good observational conditions. We weren’t being faked. These were, as I say, everyday people. In fact, there was something called the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Laboratory (PEARL) at Princeton. It was run by Bob Jahn, a supreme astrophysicist and dean of engineering at Princeton, and because of the things that they saw, they set up their laboratory. But if you came in and said, “I’m a psychic, I’d like to be tested,” they’d say, “Thank you very much. We won’t do that.” The only people they would test were normal people. What they didn’t want was somebody to come in and run some tests and put on their business card, “As tested by Princeton.” 
The world’s only pink Bottlenose dolphin which was discovered in an inland lake in Louisiana, USA, has become such an attraction that conservationists have warned tourists to leave it alone.






Buried nearly two miles beneath Antarctica the unspoilt lake has been “frozen in time” for hundreds of thousands of years sealed off from the outside world. Scientists believe it may contain tiny life forms that never been seen by humans whose existence would throw light on how life could develop in other icy environments including Mars. The team also hopes the exploration of the waters will yield vital clues about climate change and future sea-level rise. The Natural Environment Research Council NERC has awarded £6 million to a consortium of multidisciplinary research centres including the University of Bristol for the work. Over the next five years the researchers will develop the technologies needed for the project. During the 2012-2013 winter season the research team will go “deep field” into West Antarctica to sample water from the lake in the search of “tiny life forms never before seen” and to extract sediment from the lake bed to find clues as to how the climate has changed over many millennia. Professor Martyn Tranter from the University of Bristol will be analysing some of the water from the lake looking for signs of life. He said “We are all very excited at the prospect of seeing what s going on down there. Any microbes feeding on material at the bottom of the lake will be giving off a particular chemical signature that we hope to pick up in the water. “If we find anything living beneath the ice it will not only be very exciting in itself but could have implications for life in similar icy environments such as on other planets.” About the size of Lake Windermere in the Lake District the underground pool has been described as “one of the planet s last great frontiers”.”
The Vatican is sponsoring a five day conference to mark the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species.